HJR 20/SJR 58: Commission to Review,
Study and Reform Educational Leadership
July 15, 2002
Richmond
At its second meeting, the commission examined
professional development, leadership standards and qualities, challenges
facing education leadership, and suggestions for change. Representatives
of the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals, the Virginia
Association of Secondary School Principals, the Virginia Association of
School Superintendents, the Virginia School Boards Association and the
Virginia Education Association, as well as representatives of state and
national education leadership entities, addressed the commission.
Professional Development
Established by the North Carolina General
Assembly in 1984, the Principals’ Executive Program (PEP), located at
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has expanded in the last
five years from three to 10 differentiated programs, having provided professional
development opportunities for 33,000 North Carolina school administrators.
PEP’s assistant director stated that the initiative receives approximately
$1.5 million in state appropriations annually.
Residential and seminar programs include
the Developing Future Leaders, Higher School Performance, Principals as
Technology Leaders, Leadership for Career Administrators, and Central
Office Leadership programs, as well as leadership programs crafted for
new, assistant, and charter school principals. An estimated 75 percent
of five "graduating classes" from the Developing Future Leaders program
have subsequently entered programs to gain administrative licensure. In
response to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), PEP is also developing
models to assist administrators in sifting through and effectively using
existing student achievement data to enhance academic performance.
A representative of the Institute for Educational
Leadership (IEL) in Washington, D.C., noted that increased emphasis on
educational accountability calls for enhanced professional development
programs focusing on instructional issues and new accountability standards.
Also suggested by other presenters were the creation and funding of professional
development centers (an administrators’ "academy"), principal mentorships
(with compensation for mentors), a paid internship program, a master-level
license for administrators (similar to that available to teachers through
the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards), and a formal
study or survey of time spent "on the job" by Virginia principals. Modifying
training and licensure, annual performance evaluations, and professional
development opportunities to reflect Interstate School Leaders Licensure
Consortium (ISLLC) standards was also recommended.
Leadership Standards and Qualities
Instructional leadership, followed by community
and visionary leadership, is an essential quality for school administrators,
according to the president of the IEL. Noting that "everything principals
do—establishing a vision, setting goals, managing staff, rallying the
community, creating effective learning environments, building support
systems for students, guiding instruction, etc.—must be in service to
student learning," she stated that the demands of a typical 60-hour principal
workweek suggest a need to "re-culture" the school environment to accommodate
new ways of communicating and collaborating. In addition, school leadership
should be effectively distributed to other school-based staff, local councils,
parents, students, and "external stakeholders."
Principals surveyed by IEL indicated that
school administrators must "establish modes of shared monitoring of curriculum
and instruction"; create "settings for teachers to acquire new content
and instructional skills"; and "engage teachers in analyzing and understanding
effective practices." Research suggests that organizational success—academic
achievement within a school or school division, for example—is undergirded
by a shared purpose—the alignment of individuals’ values with a greater
goal, and coherence among programs. In addition, research indicates that
leadership "resides in relationship among people"—such as those between
administrators and teachers—which, if positive, can promote shared action
and values.
The executive director of the Virginia Association
of Elementary School Principals cited leadership standards for principals
and those who train them. Although 48 states have adopted some sort of
standards-driven curriculum and testing, none has similar standards for
principals. Forty-two states, including the Commonwealth, have adopted
the ISLLC standards, but little direction exists among policymakers as
to their implementation or assessment.
These standards might not only identify
a curriculum framework for principal training and professional development,
but also serve as guidelines for principals striving to hone their skills
and improve services offered to students. Renewal of licensure and the
development of a required professional growth plan based on the ISLLC
standards was also suggested.
The implementation of any school administrator
standards calls into question the adequacy of current training and professional
development programs; the availability of technical assistance; the potential
basis for these standards—whether national, regional, or state expectations;
and responsibility for the interpretation of such standards. While principals
may be given an array of standards, they will also require guidance and
training in the identification, implementation, and sustaining of strategies
to support these standards. Commission discussion also focused on distinguishing
the principal as "instructional leader" rather than a "curriculum expert."
Suggestions for Change
Repeated testimony cited identification
and recruitment of the "next generation" of principals, as 56 percent
of Virginia school leaders plan to retire in the next nine years. Discussion
focused on consideration of assistant principals and teachers as well
as "nontraditional candidates" among the applicant pool as a critical
challenge for education leadership. IEL testimony noted that, in addition,
recruitment should target narrowing the race and gender gaps.
Preparation programs for school administrators
should be anchored in the "real world" challenges and tasks facing principals
and superintendents (see Figure 1); licensure standards should be rigorous
and monitored. Also aiding recruitment and retention are portable retirement
plans as well as increased pay and recognition. Using multiple measures
to hold principals accountable—such as teacher attendance and turnover,
dropout rates, and specific, required skills, rather than sole reliance
on student test scores—was also recommended.
Figure 1: Principal Duties - Hours per
Week.
Survey conducted by the National Association
of Secondary School Principals and the Milken Family Foundation.
Other recurring issues identified as leadership
challenges are the need for increased autonomy and authority, particularly
in hiring and firing of instructional personnel; the need for more assistant
principals, especially in elementary schools; frustrations with increased
hours and expanding duties and decreasing job "do-ability"; lack of school
division support; and increased, appropriate compensation and recognition.
According to a 2001 study conducted by the VAESP, VASSP and the College
of William and Mary in conjunction with the Virginia Department of Education,
salary increases for principals have lagged behind those for teachers
in the past five years; 46 percent of principals indicated that their
increases were smaller than those of teachers (see Table 1).
Table 1:
Virginia School Principals' Salary Increases, 1996-2001
Academic
Year |
Salary Increase (%)
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 or
more |
1999-2000 to 2000-2001
|
3.4 |
6.0 |
23.7 |
30.8 |
17.2 |
11.8 |
6.7 |
1998-1999 to 1999-2000
|
4.7 |
9.4 |
28.9 |
31.9 |
14.7 |
6.6 |
3.4 |
1997-1998 to 1998-1999
|
7.0 |
11.2 |
28.7 |
32.7 |
12.2 |
5.2 |
2.5 |
1996-1997 to 1997-1998
|
9.7 |
10.7 |
28.1 |
32.0 |
11.8 |
4.9 |
2.1 |
(Virginia Association of Elementary
School Principals, Virginia Association of Secondary School Principals,
College of William and Mary, in conjunction with the Virginia Department
of Education).
According to Educational Research Services’
National Survey of Salaries and Wages in Public Schools, 2001-2002 edition,
average principal salaries in the southeast fall 7.7 percent below the
national average. The average salary for all Virginia principals was reported
at $41,103. The national mean salaries for elementary, middle, and high
school principals were $73,000, $78,176, and $83,944, respectively. Aligning
school administrator salaries more closely to those of comparable positions
in the private sector will help address the critical shortage of qualified
principal candidates.
The commission expects to meet again in
mid-September.
Chairman:
The Hon. Phillip A. Hamilton
For information, contact:
Kathleen G. Harris
Division of Legislative Services
THE
RECORD
Privacy Statement
| Legislative Services | General
Assembly |