| SJR 318: Joint Subcommittee Studying Strategies 
        & Models for the Treatment & Prevention of Substance Abuse in 
        the CommonwealthAugust 26, 2009The first meeting 
        of the interim was held at the General Assembly Building in Richmond. 
         Presentations Carol McDaid, 
        Faces and Voices of RecoveryMs. McDaid spoke on the implementation of the Paul Wellstone 
        and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 
        Ms. McDaid explained that the Act mandates nondiscriminatory addiction 
        and mental health coverage under employer-based health insurance plans, 
        SCHIP, and Medicaid. While the Act does not require that all health insurance 
        plans include additional mental health benefits, the Act will require 
        that plans offering addiction and mental health coverage must do so in 
        a nondiscriminatory manner so that co-pays, deductibles, day and visit 
        limits, and annual and lifetime caps must be the same as those for medical 
        and surgical benefits. The Act establishes a basic requirement for coverage 
        that will preempt weaker state laws but will not interfere with state 
        laws that require more comprehensive coverage.
  Implementation of 
        the Act can be expected to provide several benefits to states including: 
         
        Reduced cost shifting 
          from the private to the public sector. Increased access 
          to treatment services. Medicalization 
          rather than criminalization of behavioral health conditions. Reduced collateral 
          costs of untreated addiction. Increased private 
          investment and innovation in treatment services. Ms. McDaid noted 
        that draft federal regulations are currently circulating amongst impacted 
        federal agencies, and that final regulations are expected by October 3, 
        2009. The requirements of the Act will become effective on January 1, 
        2010, regardless of whether final regulations have been promulgated. To 
        prepare for implementation, and to ensure that the state is able to take 
        full advantage of the benefits offered by Act, Ms. McDaid suggested that 
        the state should: 
        Prepare a detailed 
          analysis of how Virginia's law and the federal parity law differ. Coordinate implementation 
          planning with the Bureau of Insurance, the Department of Behavioral 
          Health and Developmental Services, the Department of Medical Assistance 
          Services, and other impacted agencies. Provide advance 
          guidance to treatment providers, counselors, and state managed care 
          contractors on what is expected of them under the new law. Inform consumers 
          of their new rights and benefits based on the proposed state implementation. 
           Henrick Harwood, 
        National Assoc. of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors Mr. Harwood discussed recent studies of the economic impact of substance 
        abuse and substance abuse treatment activities. Mr. Harwood noted that 
        costs associated with alcohol may run as high as $243 billion nationally 
        and $6 billion in Virginia, and that costs associated with illicit drug 
        abuse may run as high as $181 billion nationally and $3.5 billion in Virginia.
  Mr. Harwood also 
        provided information on cost offsets and the economic benefits of treatment 
        and prevention activities.  Jennifer 
        Faison, Virginia Association of Community Services BoardsMs. Faison spoke on the impact of substance use disorders in Virginia, 
        treatment efficacy and capacity, the need for effective treatment strategies, 
        incorporation of evidence-based practices in Virginia's treatment and 
        prevention systems, funding, services, costs, and funding options for 
        prevention and treatment in the Commonwealth as well as information about 
        prevention activities. She noted significant waiting periods for services 
        in the Commonwealth (an average of 25.4 days for treatment services). 
        Ms. Faison also described the need to shift from an acute care model of 
        intervention and services to a chronic disease/recovery management model. 
        She stated that successful prevention and treatment interventions are 
        less costly to the Commonwealth than the potential negative effects of 
        failure to provide prevention and treatment interventions.
  Ms. Faison suggested 
        increasing funding by establishing a Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention 
        Fund to be funded by a percentage of net profits realized by the Alcoholic 
        Beverage Control Board, or through allocation of revenue realized by new 
        ABC stores and Sunday openings of ABC stores for prevention and treatment 
        services. Ms. Faison also suggested increasing user fees on alcohol products 
        and allocating these funds for prevention and treatment activities. Discussion of Work 
        Group Plans The joint subcommittee 
        discussed draft work plans developed by the Treatment and Recovery Model, 
        Prevention, and Prescription Drug Abuse Work Groups. The joint subcommittee 
        approved these work plans with limited changes. The work groups will continue 
        their work as described in these plans, and will report to the full joint 
        subcommittee at the next meeting of the full joint subcommittee. Next Meeting The next meeting 
        dates will be posted on the joint subcommittee’s website and the 
        General Assembly calendar as soon as information is available. Chairman:The Hon. Emmett 
        W. Hanger, Jr.
 For information, 
        contact:Sarah Stanton, 
        Robie Ingram, DLS Staff
 Division 
      of Legislative Services > Legislative 
      Record > 2009
 
 
  
          |