Division of Legislative Services > Legislative Record > 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HJR 75: U.S. Route 460 Communications CommitteeSeptember 26, 2007The U.S. Route 460 Communications Committee met in Richmond on September 26, 2007, with Delegate Leo C. Wardrup, Jr., as chair. Several guest speakers were invited to the meeting to provide information to the members. Prior to the presentations, Delegate Joannou inquired to whether consideration had been given to obtaining easements for passenger rail service. The chairman indicated that the Department of Transportation and Department of Rail and Public Transportation would be contacted to address the issue. Presentations Richard
Walton, Jr., of Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
The IRP’s recommendations also included aspects of the project that VDOT should address, including:
The Commonwealth Transportation Board also met in July 2007 and adopted a resolution to accept the IRP recommendations, as well as advance all three proposals concerning the project with the exception of removing the requirement that I-64 be developed as a PPTA. The Commonwealth Transportation Board, however, revised its financial support from it “will” to it "may" support allocations to advance the project. Mr. Walton stated that VDOT will make its detailed proposal (RFDP) in the Fall 2007. The deadline for detailed proposals will be Spring 2008. Negotiation and execution of an interim or comprehensive agreement will occur in Fall 2008. Delegate Joannou inquired about why the Commonwealth Transportation Board decided to take the southern route, which puts it on the other side of the railroad tracks, and whether the proposals included crossing of the tracks. Delegate Jones wondered how it was determined by the Commonwealth Transportation Board that the southern route be used. Chairman Wardrup remarked that the committee had recommended using the northern route. He stated that the Commonwealth Transportation Board would be contacted to have someone provide the members with an explanation of why the southern route was chosen over the northern route. Arthur
Collins, Executive Director, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Joseph
Vinsh, Crater Planning District Commission Delegate Jones stated that a way must be found to make the road all that it can be and that forward thinking is necessary, exploring what needs to be done and having the courage to do it. The members also discussed the economic development that Route 460 would bring to the region. Next Meeting The date of the next meeting of the U.S. Route 460 Communications Committee will be posted on the study website and online on the General Assembly calendar when the information becomes available. Chairman: For information,
contact: Website: Division of Legislative Services > Legislative Record > 2007
|