12/1/98
DRAFT
Provisions for the
Electric Industry Restructuring Act
to be Considered by the 1999
Virginia General Assembly
Submitted by
The Apartment and Office Building Association (AOBA)
As a key premise for electric industry restructuring legislation,
AOBA submits that any plan for retail competition in the provision
of generation services in Virginia must provide incentives
for VOLUNTARY DIVESTITURE of incumbent utility generation
assets through open competitive auctions. Use of incentives for
this form of voluntary divestiture facilitates restructuring by
reducing controversy over proper valuation of utility generation
assets and by making the divestiture a business decision for incumbent
utilities, not a governmental mandate.
Restructuring legislation must also ensure the establishment of
competitive markets before ratepayers are required to pay for
costs that may be "stranded" by the transition to competitive
offering of generation services. In this context, it must be remembered
that Stranded Costs can only occur where competition exists. In
other words, in the absence of effective competition there can
be no stranded costs and no justification for stranded cost recovery.
Furthermore, legislation must guard against both (a) unfair treatment
of investments undertaken by utility shareholders to meet their
existing public service obligations and (b) treatments of generation
assets which result in utility shareholders deriving Windfall
Profits at the expense of consumers.
56-579. Schedule for Transition to Retail Competition
- September 1, 1999 the SCC renders a determination regarding
minimum criteria for effective competition in retail electric
generation markets in Virginia for (a) energy and (b) firm generating
capacity, as well as specific criteria for utility filings for
the implementation of retail competition transition plans.
- January 1, 2000 commencement of large scale pilot programs
for retail competition open to not less than 10% of each utility's
total generation service requirements.
- April 1, 2000 incumbent utilities file retail competition
transition plans which provide for: (a) the establishment and
maintenance of competitive retail markets for electric generation
services (including markets for both electric energy and firm
electric generating capacity) unbundled rates for electric services,
(b) a full assessment of the market value of all utility-owned
generation assets, and (c) a plan for the availability of Customer
Choice for at least one-third of customers in each rate class
by January 1, 2002 and Customer Choice for all customers no later
than January 1, 2004.
- July 1, 2001 the SCC renders utility-specific orders regarding
each utility's transition plans including (a) approval of unbundled
rates for electric services, (b) appropriate transition charges,
establishment and maintenance of competitive markets, and (c)
- No recovery of Stranded Costs is permitted for a utility until
(a) the SCC certifies that minimum criteria for competitive retail
markets have been met within the utility's service territory for
both electric energy and firm generating capacity, and (b) Customer
Choice is made available to all customers.
- The appropriate time period for the recovery of net Stranded
Costs from ratepayers or the return of net Stranded Benefits to
ratepayers shall be determined by the SCC on a case-by-case basis
with due consideration to (a) moderation of impacts on customers
bills and (b) facilitating the development of competitive generation
markets.
56-580. Nondiscriminatory Access to Transmission and Distribution
- Access to transmission and distribution systems for all, at
rates that are just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory.
- Distribution rates and services are subject to SCC oversight
with rate calculated using traditional cost of service principles.
Unbundled rates for distribution services shall be established
in a manner that reflects only those risks directly associated
with the provision of such services.
- Transmission services subject to FERC oversight (no need for
state legislation).
56-582 Regional Power Exchanges:
- Electricity consumers in Virginia may purchase generation
through any RPX or, at their option, direct from a generator/supplier
through a bilateral contract.
- The SCC shall have oversight of the structures and operations
RPXs serving Virginia retail markets to the extent necessary to
ensure that in no event is an RPX used to impede retail competition.
56-585 Licensure and Regulation of Suppliers of Retail Electric
Services:
- The SCC shall have appropriate regulatory authority over all
retail suppliers, marketers, and brokers of retail electric generation
services.
- Retail suppliers of competitive electric services shall be
required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the SCC appropriate
financial strength and responsibility, technical expertise, and
practical capabilities to comply with all requirements for such
suppliers that are established by the SCC for the protection of
the public.
- The SCC shall be authorized to set minimum generation capacity
reserve criteria for all providers of firm electric generation
services and to require periodic demonstration that each supplier,
marketer or broker of firm generation services operating within
the state has title to sufficient generation capacity to meet
the SCC's minimum firm generating capacity requirements for their
existing and projected service requirements.
- The SCC shall establish reasonable rule and regulations (including
codes of conduct) regarding utility interactions with competitive
marketers of generation services.
- In no instance shall an officer or director of a utility also
service as an agent, employee, officer, director of an unregulated
affiliate that is engaged in the marketing of competitive electric
services.
56-586 Supplier of Last Resort and Default Provider:
- Until further action of the SCC, the utility will retain the
obligation to serve customers who are unable to obtain generation
from an alternative supplier or who terminate service with (or
are terminated by) an alternative supplier of generation services.
- The SCC may establish criteria for and methods for selecting
the entity to be the supplier of last resort and default provider
of generation services.
- Customers who do not use an alternative supplier of generation
services will be provided power that is obtained by the distribution
utility through competitive wholesale market transactions or the
equivalent thereof.
- The SCC shall establish appropriate penalties to be paid by
suppliers who fail to meet their firm power supply obligations.
56-587 Voluntary Aggregation:
- Any and all customers may voluntarily aggregate their electrical
energy and demands for the purpose of negotiating the purchase
of electric generation services from any supplier.
- Customers with multiple accounts may, at their discretion
and direction, aggregate and/or assign their generation requirements
within and across customer classes so as to maximize their competitive
options.
- As long as all tariff otherwise applicable charges are paid
for distribution services, the SCC shall impose no restrictions
on the decisions of customers or groups of customers to aggregate
loads across utility service territories and across jurisdictional
boundaries.
56-591 Transition Costs and Benefits (Stranded Costs/Stranded
Benefits)
- The SCC may not order divestiture of utility
assets, but the SCC may provide reasonable incentives for utility
divestiture of generation assess in the form either or both (a)
the withholding of stranded cost recovery until effective competition
in retail generation markets is demonstrated or (b) sales commissions
paid to utility shareholders for open auctioning generation assets.
- The results of a reasonably structured, open, and independently
administered auctions of utility generation assets shall be accepted
by the SCC as a demonstration of the market value of such assets.
- If an auction of a utility generation asset is administered
by an independent third-party, there shall be no restriction on
an affiliate of the utility bidding for the purchase of such assets.
- The SCC shall limit utility recovery of Transition Costs to
demonstrated stranded costs plus those costs actually incurred
to facilitate the transition to competitive retail markets for
electric services that cannot reasonably be provided by competitive
suppliers of generation services.
- Recoveries of net Stranded Costs and payments of net Stranded
Benefits as applicable must be reconciled for each utility with
the total Stranded Cost recoveries (or Stranded Benefits payments)
determined by the SCC for that utility.
56-592. Wires Charges:
- The SCC may use wires charges as a means of payment of stranded
costs or collection of other transition costs. (Note the word
"nonbypassable" is stricken because it is not
enforceable. In reality, utilities would have great difficulty
collecting revenues from persons or entities that are not current
distribution system customers.)
- Wires charges may be designed to the load characteristics
of specific rate classes and of individual customers within rate
classes. Wire charges may have both demand and energy components
and need not be collected solely on a cents per kilowatt-hour
basis.
56-593 Functional Separation
- Functional separation of generation, transmission, and distribution
activities of each incumbent utility shall be achieved not later
than January 1, 2001.
- The SCC shall encourage existing investor-owned utilities
to achieve complete financial segregation of their existing generation,
transmission and distribution functions by not later than January
1, 2002 such that no direct or indirect cross-subsidies can occur
in the pricing of generation, transmission, and distribution services.
- The SCC shall have oversight responsibility with respect to
all transactions (including cost sharing arrangements) between
a utility and its affiliates.
- Sharing of utility operating personnel with affiliates shall
be minimized.
- The SCC shall establish reasonable rules and regulations (including
codes of conduct) regarding utility interactions with affiliated
entities, including utility interactions with its parent company
(i.e., holding company) where the parent company either directly,
or through an affiliate or subsidiary, participates in the competitive
marketing of generation services within the utility's service
territory.
- In no instance shall the SCC permit the compensation of a
utility employee to be influenced by the performance of an unregulated
affiliate that is engaged in the marketing of competitive electric
services.