SJR 347: Commission on the Revision of Virginia's State Tax Code and 
        the Streamlined Sales Tax Project 
      
      July 15, 2003 
        Richmond 
      The commission, which 
        held its first meeting for 2003 in Richmond, was created to follow-up 
        on the work of the Hanger/McDonnell Commission (SJR 387/HJR 685, 2001; 
        HJR 60, 2002). 
      Comments by Legislators
      The meeting began 
        with comments by the co-chairmen, Senator Hanger and Delegate Parrish, 
        who spoke of the difficult task the commission faces in developing a tax 
        reform plan that will bring Virginias tax code into the 21st Century. 
        They emphasized that any changes that might be suggested must create a 
        more equitable, efficient, and easy-to-understand system; one that takes 
        into account the new economy based more on services than goods.  
      Two members of of 
        the House Appropriations Committee addressed the commission regarding 
        the spending side of the budget. They urged the commission to consider 
        all its options in developing a fair and efficient tax policy plan in 
        order for the state to have the funds needed to pay for the basic obligations 
        it faces in the next biennium. 
      Staff Presentations
      The commission heard 
        from legislative staff and a National Conference of State Legislatures 
        (NCSL) representative. Legislative staff reviewed the recommendations 
        of the earlier Hanger/McDonnell Commission. Other issues that the Hanger/McDonnell 
        Commission discussed during its two-year existence were also mentioned. 
         
      An area that received 
        considerable attention was the individual income tax. The particular issues 
        that received the most attention were the standard deduction, personal 
        exemptions, tax rates, tax preferences (i.e., deductions, exemptions, 
        credits), and conformity with the federal tax code. 
      Finally, staff presented 
        a list showing the estimated fiscal impact of certain tax-related items. 
        The list consisted of items that would cost the government money and those 
        that would produce money for government services. Some of the items that 
        would cost money:  
      
        - Elimination of 
          the local BPOL tax;
 
        - Phaseout of the 
          sales tax on food;
 
        - Phaseout of the 
          property tax on certain automobiles;
 
        -  Repeal of the 
          estate tax;
 
        - Elimination of 
          the marriage penalty in the income tax;
 
        - Repeal of the 
          accelerated sales tax payments by dealers; and 
 
        - Continuation of 
          the age deduction as it currently exists. 
 
       
      Those items that 
        would produce money include: 
      
        - Elimination of 
          certain sales tax exemptions;
 
        - Reduction of certain 
          income tax deductions, subtractions and credits; and 
 
        - Increase in certain 
          tax rates. 
          
 
       
      Streamlined Sales 
        Tax Project
      An NCSL representative 
        gave a brief history of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project, including how 
        it came about, what its purpose is, and where it currently stands. Basically, 
        the issue involves requiring out-of-state retailers to collect the sales 
        tax from consumers who owe the tax when they buy goods over the Internet 
        and through catalogues. There currently are two federal cases that prohibit 
        such collection due to the complexity of states sales tax systems 
        and the burden it puts on out-of-state retailers to determine the tax 
        owed. Therefore, the goal of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project has been 
        to develop an agreement that the states can adopt and that simplifies 
        the sales and use tax systems, allowing them to remain as useful cogs 
        in the wheels of state taxes. Once enough states voluntarily adopt the 
        agreement, it is hoped that Congress will grant the states the power to 
        require all retailers, wherever they are located, to collect the sales 
        and use taxes owed. One of the issues the commission will address is whether 
        Virginia should adopt the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement.  
      Work Plan
      Delegate Parrish 
        explained that the commission has four meetings in which to accomplish 
        its task of state tax reform. To assist in the process there was some 
        discussion regarding the possible use of subcommittees. Letters will be 
        sent to the commission members once the co-chairmen determine what the 
        best approach is for keeping to the schedule and following the charge 
        given them in SJR 347.  
      Chairmen: 
        The Hon. Emmett W. Hanger, Jr. 
        The Hon. Harry J. 
        Parrish 
      For information, 
        contact: 
        Joan E. Putney 
        Division of Legislative Services 
      Website: 
         
        http://dls.state.va.us/sjr347TaxCode.htm 
        
       THE 
        RECORD   
        
Privacy Statement 
  | Legislative Services | General 
  Assembly     |