HJR 20/SJR 58: Commission to Review, 
        Study and Reform Educational Leadership
      July 15, 2002 
        Richmond
      At its second meeting, the commission examined 
        professional development, leadership standards and qualities, challenges 
        facing education leadership, and suggestions for change. Representatives 
        of the Virginia Association of Elementary School Principals, the Virginia 
        Association of Secondary School Principals, the Virginia Association of 
        School Superintendents, the Virginia School Boards Association and the 
        Virginia Education Association, as well as representatives of state and 
        national education leadership entities, addressed the commission. 
      Professional Development 
      Established by the North Carolina General 
        Assembly in 1984, the Principals’ Executive Program (PEP), located at 
        the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, has expanded in the last 
        five years from three to 10 differentiated programs, having provided professional 
        development opportunities for 33,000 North Carolina school administrators. 
        PEP’s assistant director stated that the initiative receives approximately 
        $1.5 million in state appropriations annually. 
      Residential and seminar programs include 
        the Developing Future Leaders, Higher School Performance, Principals as 
        Technology Leaders, Leadership for Career Administrators, and Central 
        Office Leadership programs, as well as leadership programs crafted for 
        new, assistant, and charter school principals. An estimated 75 percent 
        of five "graduating classes" from the Developing Future Leaders program 
        have subsequently entered programs to gain administrative licensure. In 
        response to the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), PEP is also developing 
        models to assist administrators in sifting through and effectively using 
        existing student achievement data to enhance academic performance. 
      A representative of the Institute for Educational 
        Leadership (IEL) in Washington, D.C., noted that increased emphasis on 
        educational accountability calls for enhanced professional development 
        programs focusing on instructional issues and new accountability standards. 
        Also suggested by other presenters were the creation and funding of professional 
        development centers (an administrators’ "academy"), principal mentorships 
        (with compensation for mentors), a paid internship program, a master-level 
        license for administrators (similar to that available to teachers through 
        the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards), and a formal 
        study or survey of time spent "on the job" by Virginia principals. Modifying 
        training and licensure, annual performance evaluations, and professional 
        development opportunities to reflect Interstate School Leaders Licensure 
        Consortium (ISLLC) standards was also recommended. 
      Leadership Standards and Qualities
      Instructional leadership, followed by community 
        and visionary leadership, is an essential quality for school administrators, 
        according to the president of the IEL. Noting that "everything principals 
        do—establishing a vision, setting goals, managing staff, rallying the 
        community, creating effective learning environments, building support 
        systems for students, guiding instruction, etc.—must be in service to 
        student learning," she stated that the demands of a typical 60-hour principal 
        workweek suggest a need to "re-culture" the school environment to accommodate 
        new ways of communicating and collaborating. In addition, school leadership 
        should be effectively distributed to other school-based staff, local councils, 
        parents, students, and "external stakeholders." 
      Principals surveyed by IEL indicated that 
        school administrators must "establish modes of shared monitoring of curriculum 
        and instruction"; create "settings for teachers to acquire new content 
        and instructional skills"; and "engage teachers in analyzing and understanding 
        effective practices." Research suggests that organizational success—academic 
        achievement within a school or school division, for example—is undergirded 
        by a shared purpose—the alignment of individuals’ values with a greater 
        goal, and coherence among programs. In addition, research indicates that 
        leadership "resides in relationship among people"—such as those between 
        administrators and teachers—which, if positive, can promote shared action 
        and values. 
      The executive director of the Virginia Association 
        of Elementary School Principals cited leadership standards for principals 
        and those who train them. Although 48 states have adopted some sort of 
        standards-driven curriculum and testing, none has similar standards for 
        principals. Forty-two states, including the Commonwealth, have adopted 
        the ISLLC standards, but little direction exists among policymakers as 
        to their implementation or assessment. 
      These standards might not only identify 
        a curriculum framework for principal training and professional development, 
        but also serve as guidelines for principals striving to hone their skills 
        and improve services offered to students. Renewal of licensure and the 
        development of a required professional growth plan based on the ISLLC 
        standards was also suggested. 
      The implementation of any school administrator 
        standards calls into question the adequacy of current training and professional 
        development programs; the availability of technical assistance; the potential 
        basis for these standards—whether national, regional, or state expectations; 
        and responsibility for the interpretation of such standards. While principals 
        may be given an array of standards, they will also require guidance and 
        training in the identification, implementation, and sustaining of strategies 
        to support these standards. Commission discussion also focused on distinguishing 
        the principal as "instructional leader" rather than a "curriculum expert." 
      Suggestions for Change
      Repeated testimony cited identification 
        and recruitment of the "next generation" of principals, as 56 percent 
        of Virginia school leaders plan to retire in the next nine years. Discussion 
        focused on consideration of assistant principals and teachers as well 
        as "nontraditional candidates" among the applicant pool as a critical 
        challenge for education leadership. IEL testimony noted that, in addition, 
        recruitment should target narrowing the race and gender gaps. 
      Preparation programs for school administrators 
        should be anchored in the "real world" challenges and tasks facing principals 
        and superintendents (see Figure 1); licensure standards should be rigorous 
        and monitored. Also aiding recruitment and retention are portable retirement 
        plans as well as increased pay and recognition. Using multiple measures 
        to hold principals accountable—such as teacher attendance and turnover, 
        dropout rates, and specific, required skills, rather than sole reliance 
        on student test scores—was also recommended. 
      Figure 1: Principal Duties - Hours per 
        Week.
        
      Survey conducted by the National Association 
        of Secondary School Principals and the Milken Family Foundation. 
      Other recurring issues identified as leadership 
        challenges are the need for increased autonomy and authority, particularly 
        in hiring and firing of instructional personnel; the need for more assistant 
        principals, especially in elementary schools; frustrations with increased 
        hours and expanding duties and decreasing job "do-ability"; lack of school 
        division support; and increased, appropriate compensation and recognition. 
        According to a 2001 study conducted by the VAESP, VASSP and the College 
        of William and Mary in conjunction with the Virginia Department of Education, 
        salary increases for principals have lagged behind those for teachers 
        in the past five years; 46 percent of principals indicated that their 
        increases were smaller than those of teachers (see Table 1). 
      
        Table 1: 
        Virginia School Principals' Salary Increases, 1996-2001
         
          | Academic 
            Year | 
          Salary Increase (%) 
             | 
          
          | 0 | 
          1 | 
          2 | 
          3 | 
          4 | 
          5 | 
          6 or 
            more  | 
          
          | 1999-2000 to 2000-2001 
             | 
           
             3.4  | 
           
             6.0  | 
           
             23.7  | 
           
             30.8  | 
           
             17.2  | 
           
             11.8  | 
           
             6.7   | 
          
          | 1998-1999 to 1999-2000 
             | 
           
             4.7  | 
           
             9.4  | 
           
             28.9  | 
           
             31.9  | 
           
             14.7  | 
           
             6.6  | 
           
             3.4   | 
          
          | 1997-1998 to 1998-1999 
             | 
           
             7.0  | 
           
             11.2  | 
           
             28.7  | 
           
             32.7  | 
           
             12.2  | 
           
             5.2  | 
           
             2.5   | 
          
          | 1996-1997 to 1997-1998 
             | 
           
             9.7  | 
           
             10.7  | 
           
             28.1  | 
           
             32.0  | 
           
             11.8  | 
           
             4.9  | 
           
             2.1   | 
        
      (Virginia Association of Elementary 
        School Principals, Virginia Association of Secondary School Principals, 
        College of William and Mary, in conjunction with the Virginia Department 
        of Education). 
      According to Educational Research Services’ 
        National Survey of Salaries and Wages in Public Schools, 2001-2002 edition, 
        average principal salaries in the southeast fall 7.7 percent below the 
        national average. The average salary for all Virginia principals was reported 
        at $41,103. The national mean salaries for elementary, middle, and high 
        school principals were $73,000, $78,176, and $83,944, respectively. Aligning 
        school administrator salaries more closely to those of comparable positions 
        in the private sector will help address the critical shortage of qualified 
        principal candidates. 
      The commission expects to meet again in 
        mid-September. 
      Chairman: 
      The Hon. Phillip A. Hamilton 
      For information, contact: 
      Kathleen G. Harris 
        Division of Legislative Services 
       THE 
        RECORD   
        
Privacy Statement 
  | Legislative Services | General 
  Assembly     |